Lesson #5 - You know what THEY say?
-
Imagine that you
have arranged a personal meeting with your legislator to request
access to licensed home birth midwives. You identified the ways in
which licensing and regulation of midwives would benefit you and
the community. You then neatly avoided the "selfish mother"
trap by answering the question of why you would choose home birth
with reasons that center on safety and the well-being of baby. But
then your legislator mentions the numerous e-mails from the many
reputable physicians in his/her district that desire to defeat
any bill involving home birth and midwifery because it is so
dangerous. NOW WHAT?
-
Step One: Remain
calm.
Expect this kind of opposition. The American Medical Association
has pledged to strongly oppose home birth and midwifery and has
created the Scope of Practice Partnership (SOPP) to oppose all
expansion of practice by nonphysicians. On the surface AMA members
will claim it is because of concerns for safety, but in 2008 the
Supreme Court in Missouri listened to their arguments and told them
safety and protection of patients was not their motive, rather it
was economics. Protection of their "turf" under the ruse
of representing the health and safety of the patients earned them
"Lack of Standing" in their case opposing CPM practice.
The case was dismissed and CPMs in Missouri are legal to practice.
-
Step Two: Remain
confident.
By their own admission in their own documents to their own members,
the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology "does not
defeat this issue on the merits of the debate." They have no
solid research with which to defend their position so they instead
will grab whatever information looks like it might favor them and
try to lead the less-critical thinkers into believing their
position is evidence-based. They describe their own efforts as
"deft political maneuvering and hardball tactics."
Licensing and regulating home birth practice using the CPM
credential is based on evidence. The position of truth will
eventually see justice. In the meantime, be aware of the hardballs
about to fly. (The latest example of these tactics is the now infamous Wax Paper, a meta-analysis yielding poor conclusions regarding infant mortality rates that has been sharply criticized by the international community.)
-
Step Three: Be
prepared.
It remains to be seen what scary statistics will be used to
generate hysteria this coming year. Be prepared to hear just about
anything, but realize that whatever statistics are offered to
discredit home birth, they will be numbers taken out of context.
ABC will be on the lookout for abuse of "research" during
the session, so if you hear a legislator express concern,
accurately document the information that is alarming to him/her and
then provide that information to ABC. We will then do our best to
provide the background needed to correctly interpret the hype, and
hopefully provide some means of bridging understanding.
|
|